Major Chinese exchange BTCC has thrown its support for the Fresh York Agreement (BTC1), also known spil Segwit2X spil miners and developers agree on a scaling solution and, te the process, avoid a hard fork.
One of China’s ‘big three’ exchanges has publicly announced support for SegWit2X a key proposal that seeks to upgrade bitcoin by enacting the long-proposed code optimization known spil SegWit, or Segregated Witness.
Te a statement to clarify its position, BTCC wrote on its webstek:
BTCC fully supports the Fresh York Agreement (BTC1). The Fresh York Agreement already has more than 80 procent of the network’s hashing power, and wij hope that the community will reach overeenstemming around this implementation of the bitcoin software.
To this end, BTCC further exposed it is ‘actively participating’ ter both testing and implementing the scaling proposal. The Shanghai-based exchange is ter the process of adopting upgrading its wallets to the fresh software, with upgrades expected to be finish by Friday, July 21 st . Further, BTCC’s mining pool is already signaling support for the scaling solution with its wallets also being upgraded.
If support for the upgrade does not reach the required threshold of 80%, the ensuing hard fork would see the bitcoin blockchain split and create two bitcoins. Te such an event, BTCC says its ‘highest priority’ would be securing customers’ funds.
‘In case of a hard fork, BTCC will give existing customers tokens on the minority chains based on how many tokens they have on the majority chain at the time of the hard fork,” BTCC added. The exchange further insisted it will always consider longest blockchain with the most hashing power spil bitcoin (BTC).
Other exchanges programma contingencies te the event of a chain split include US-based GDAX and Chinese bitcoin giant OKCoin who will both suspend withdrawals, deposits and overall trading of bitcoin.
However, fears of a hard fork are falling by the wayside spil bitcoin’s hashing might swells to signal for the upgrade.
Get via App Store Read this postbode te our app!
Is Legitimate TH/s Enough to Commence My Own Pool?
I’m thinking of developing a mining pool for myself and close friends. I realize that there are large pools like BTC Guild, Slush, etc. that wij could join, but I like the idea of creating my own.
I’m taking delivery of 6 Neptune miners from KnC te Q2 that will give mij Legal TH/s. I know that’s not a fine overeenkomst, but it’s a commence. and my friends will add their own computing power spil well.
To be fair, I’m not a “technical” kinda fellow, I’m a business man. So here’s my question(s):
1) How would I go about developing a pool and treat automatic payouts? Two) How could I create a instrumentenbord that permits my friends (and maybe one day the public) to see their mining activity?
I appreciate and look forward to your responses.
Setting up a mining pool will require some programming, so based on your self-identification spil a business man, I would suggest to embark with asking yourself how much this will be worth to you. Many would say that running a bitcoin pool is likely a bit of an altruistic endeavour: If you want to attract people to join your pool, you are rivaling with others. This competition drives pool payouts close to 100% payout of block prize plus earned transaction fees plus free insurance against the stochastic nature of actually finding a block, and possibly against the pool making a mistake such spil losing bitcoin temporarily stored for participants.
However, if you are a business man through and through, there might yet be a profit motive to be found: Successfully running a pool certainly will build up you credentials ter the bitcoin world, which could be valuable for doing other bitcoin business. Then hypothetically having a large pool could help te suggesting future services like enabling bitcoin businesses to more quickly accept bitcoin payments by insuring against dual spending. Eventually, I have bot wondering about pairing a mining pool with a bingo-like gambling factor, where customers could bet on when the pool will next find a block (for the combined effect of reserve revenue and helping to insure the pool technicus against not finding a block for a prolonged time). Note that both the payment insurance and the gambling idea is likely to raise legal issues and may be expensive to begin te a law-abiding way due to legal/licensing overhead.
Whether running a pool is worth it to you depends on the value you link to all of that. To help you make an estimate, consider that with your hashrate of Legitimate TH/s you’d contribute 0.15% of the total hashrate today (and less tomorrow), see e.g. the stats pagina bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin. That means you need to wait, on average, about 670 blocks or approximately five days until you find a block, with actual values fluctuating frantically according to the Poisson distribution, provided none of your miners maliciously cheats and withholds blocks found. Hence you will either need tremendous tolerance about actual block prizes and payouts possibly diverging purely by chance, or more hash power. Or a vain or altruistic outlook on this project, or a side business associated with running the mining pool.
welcome to bitcoin stack exchange.
its generally frowned upon to ask for entire walkthroughs of large projects. It’s suggested that you instead make some attempt at the problem very first, and state what you have done.
To response the question te the title of your postbode, yes, you will find a block every 6-10 days with Eighteen TH/s depending on the increase te difficulty by then (presently you would find one every Four days). You can better project the time taken by consulting a chart on difficulty. That is still a fair amount of luck however, so if you are risk reluctant it would benefit you to join a pool.
If you want to create your own pool I would suggest creating your own p2pool knot. Not only do you get all of your own blocks but you get a petite percentage of any shares the public might add that contribute to blocks.
Well im looking for the reaction myself, however the calculations don’t seem to promising , here is what i have
bitman power is 465.81 PH/s (460000000000000) my power atm is Four.Five TH (4500000000)
4500000000 / 460000000000000 = 102222.22
102222.22 X more powerful than mij
there average mine is 1 hour . and what they do ter an hour would take mij 4259.26 Days
If my calculations are onberispelijk..
but they have mined some blocks te Four mins, which should take mij 284 days i cant see how wij can actually mine a block with thesis statistics.